This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hartje, S. C. Articles by Franklin, E. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Twin Tragedies in the Twin Cities: Childhood Lead Poisoning and the Loss of Affordable Rental Housing

Seattle Pacific University

Becky Love Yust

University of Minnesota

Edward G. Goetz

University of Minnesota

Evelyn M. Franklin

University of Minnesota

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact that the Minnesota lead policy had on affordable rental housing in Minneapolis and St. Paul. Questionnaires were sent to 487 owners of property in those cities who were issued lead orders in 1994 or 1995; 147 questionnaires were returned. There was a significant difference in the implementation of the state policy by the two cities. Lead orders written by the City of Minneapolis required more work, more complex work, and higher costs than did the lead orders written by the City of St. Paul. Orders issued by St. Paul were more in line with hazard reduction (lead-safe) activities, whereas those issued by Minneapolis were more in line with abatement (lead-free) activities. In Minneapolis, there was a significantly greater loss of affordable housing units through abandonment by the property owner, condemnation by the city, increased vacancy periods, and changes in the affordability level.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, 230-251 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X01293002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?