Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marlowe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Godwin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Relationship of Income and Human Capital to Debt/Asset Ratio of Farm Families

Julia Marlowe

Cooperative Extension Service, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

Deborah Godwin

Dept. of Housing, Management, and Consumer Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

Financial well-being of farm families is often defined in terms of their debt-asset ratio. This study utilized the human capital theory to determine variables which predict debt/asset ratio by analyzing 489 farm families in seven states in the South and Midwest. Respondents answered a mailed questionnaire in 1985. The human capital approach was supported with key human capital variables, number of years farming, and husbands' education as predictors of debt/asset ratio. Total family income was found to have a curvilinear relationship with debt/asset ratio. Total income and region of country were also significant predictors. Discriminant analysis correctly classified almost 60 percent of the sample into three financial categories: safe, moderately risky, and risky.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, 95-109 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X8801700110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?