Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lunde, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lindley, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Window Treatments in Cold Climates

Helen A. Lunde

Textiles and Clothing Department; College of Home Economics, North Dakota State University, Fargo ND 58105

James A. Lindley

Agricultural Engineering Department, College of Agriculture, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105

Window treatments were compared for their ability to reduce heat loss through a double-glazed window under subzero weather conditions. A full-sized window was used in a laboratory test system. Roller shades, roman shades, films, and other selected treatments were found to significantly reduced heat loss com pared to the bare window (p < 0.025). Heat loss was reduced to nearly half when roller shades and roman shades were sealed to the window frame. Draperies tested were not significantly different from the bare window. Unlike other re searchers (Hirning & Woell, 1978; U.S. Department of Energy, 1984), the covered cornice did not reduce heat loss, and combinations of window treatments did not improve effectiveness over a single treatment. A cost evaluation indicated that home-constructed roman shades and polystyrene boards would be cost ef fective and provide significant reduction of heat loss.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 16, No. 3, 222-234 (1988)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X8801600307


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?