Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dardis, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Welfare Impact of Orderly Marketing Agreements for Nonrubber Footwear

Rachel Dardis

Department of Textiles and Consumer Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

Jia-Yeong Lin

Department of Textiles and Consumer Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

The objective of this paper was to estimate the welfare loss from the implemen tation of Orderly Marketing Agreements (OMAs) for nonrubber footwear with Taiwan and Korea. Partial equilibrium analysis was used to estimate the welfare loss based on price and quality changes due to the OMAs. Actual prices and quantities were derived from trade data while estimated prices and quantities were based on pre and post OMA data, and the price elasticity of demand for imports. Loss estimates were obtained from 1977/78 to 1980/81 and were dis counted to 1977/78 using a 10 percent discount rate. The present value of the welfare loss, in constant 1977/78 dollars, was $366 million with Taiwan accounting for more than 80 percent of this loss. The consumer loss was $342 million, re flecting higher prices paid by consumers and losses incurred by consumers who left the market due to higher prices. The fact that the OMAs were imposed on two major low cost exporters to the U.S. also meant that low income consumers bore a disproportionate share of the cost of protecting the domestic footwear industry.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 64-73 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X8601500108


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?