Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, P. N.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, G. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Economic Well-Being Of Elderly Families And Individuals: An Alternative Measure

Pamela N. Olson

Department of Family Studies, College of Education, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131

Geraldine I. Olson

Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331

Resource distribution and adequacy, of elderly individuals and families, was measured by determining an annual dollar value of money and nonmoney eco nomic resources. The data was collected by interviewing 75 residents, 70 years or older, in Bernalillo County (Albuquerque), New Mexico, during 1980. The Gini Coefficient changed from .344 (money income only) to .186 with both money and nonmoney incomes. When household production and community-provided goods and services were omitted, due to the method of valuation (based on prior research), the Gini Coefficient was .616, indicating greater inequality. The Cochran Q test was used to determine whether there were changes in the number of families below poverty as nonmoney economic resources were in cluded. Based on money income, 15 families were defined as being in poverty. No family was defined in poverty with all nonmoney resources in the measure; the change was significant (p < 0.05). However, removing household production and community-provided goods and services, nine families remained in poverty.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, 32-42 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X8601500104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?