Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blinn, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Blair, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Recruitment Materials Utilized In Home Economics Education, Business, and Foods, Nutrition, and Dietetics: A Log-Linear Comparison

Lynn Marie Blinn

Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Home Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37999-1900

Connie M. Blair

College of Home Economics, The Ohio State University, 1787 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210

Programs in higher education such as Home Economics Education, Business, and Foods, Nutrition, and Dietetics have experienced changes in numbers of under graduate and graduate students during the last decade. This research addresses the following questions: Are there significant differences in the quality and type of recruitment materials sent to prospective undergraduates and graduates in these three program areas? Are there differences in the numbers of males, fe males, older, and nontraditional students represented in the recruitment mate rials from these three program areas? The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences in the numbers of brochures, booklets, information sheets, and letters sent to prospective students in these three areas. However, there appear to be nonsignificant differences in the cost of materials and the numbers of materials sent to undergraduate and graduate students. Likewise, there appear to be significant differences in the types of individuals represented in the materials from the three areas, but nonsignificant differences in the types of individuals represented in materials designed for undergraduate and graduate students. Recommendations are presented for further study in the area of effec tive student recruitment in higher education, particularly in the area of aesthetic preferences for and the graphic design of home economics materials.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 51-60 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X8501400106


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?