Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Looker, A.
Right arrow Articles by Shannon, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Nutrition Education Model For Training and Updating EFNEP Aides

Anne Looker

Nutrition Program, 202 Human Development Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

Patricia Long

Nutrition Program, 202 Human Development Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

Louise Hamilton

Pennsylvania Cooperative Extension Service, 106 Borland Lab, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

Barbara Shannon

Nutrition Program, 202 Human Development Building, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

A nutrition education model was developed for training and updating EFNEP aides and home economists without requiring face-to-face contact with the nutrition specialist. The model incorporated six modules that focused on pertinent nutrition topics. Each consisted of a self-instruction guide for the home economists, a teaching package with audiovisual materials for the aides' training session, and lesson plans with handouts for aides' use with their homemakers. Pilot testing of the first two modules (without employing a control group) indicated that the approach was feasible. The design for testing the remaining four modules included an experimental group, made up of EFNEP aides who attended training sessions between pre- and posttesting, and a control group, made up of aides who attended the sessions after posttesting was completed. Experimental aides had significantly greater gains in nutrition knowledge than control aides for three of the four modules. Aides and home economists rated the modules favorably, and aides particularly enjoyed the role-playing activities. The aides felt that the information and skills gained from the sessions would be helpful to them when working with homemakers.

Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 11, No. 4, 392-400 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/1077727X8301100409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?